
Judge dismisses case against two officers after prosecutors withheld evidence
A judge found that prosecutors had deliberately withheld evidence from the defense, and dismissed the indictment as a sanction.
What happened
In April 2018 two off-duty St. Louis officers struggled with a man in the parking lot of a South St. Louis bar. During the struggle the man’s gun went off, wounding one of the officers, and the other officer fired, wounding the man.
A grand jury declined to indict the officers. Prosecutors then presented the case to a second grand jury, which indicted them.
The outcome
The defense learned that prosecutors had not turned over the transcript of the second grand jury. According to the reports, that grand jury was not shown the surveillance video and was not told of an agreement prosecutors had made with the man who was shot.
In December 2019 the judge found that prosecutors had deliberately failed to disclose the evidence, and dismissed the indictment as a sanction. The ruling also noted that the surveillance video appeared to contradict statements made to the grand jury, and described a pattern of disclosure failures in the Circuit Attorney’s office. The office said at the time that it would refile the charges.
Read the coverage
- KSDK “St. Louis judge tosses case against officers who shot man outside of bar, citing video evidence” · Free to read
- St. Louis Post-Dispatch “Judge sanctions St. Louis prosecutors by dismissing case against 2 officers” · A subscription may be required
Past results afford no guarantee of future results, and every case is different and must be judged on its own merits. The summaries are written by the office from published reports; each article belongs to its publisher, and some require a subscription.
Photograph: Mel Carnahan Courthouse by Kbh3rd, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; cropped.
In the news
More officers’ cases
Other coverage of Brian’s cases for police officers.
All coverage-
Not guilty
Former officer found not guilty in a 2017 downtown arrest
A judge ruled that a former St. Louis officer acted lawfully and used objectively reasonable force in a 2017 arrest in which a man’s jaw was broken.
-
Not guilty
Former undercover officer found not guilty over a 2019 stop and search
A judge ruled that prosecutors had not proved a former officer lacked probable cause to stop and search a man he believed he had seen in a drug deal.
-
Not guilty
Former officer found not guilty over pepper spray at 2017 protests
A judge found that a former officer’s use of pepper spray at a September 2017 downtown protest was justified, after threats, attacks on other officers and orders to disperse.
-
Not guilty
Officer acquitted in the overtime pay case
The first of four officers charged over overtime pay was acquitted, after a judge found that forgery had not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
Not guilty
Former officer acquitted over an off-duty arrest at a gas station
A judge ruled that prosecutors had not proved a former officer lacked the authority to make an arrest while off duty, and that the force he used at a St. Louis gas station in 2019 was appropriate.
-
Cases dropped
Overtime pay cases against three officers dropped
Prosecutors dismissed the overtime pay cases against the three remaining officers after a judge refused them more time to gather records.

Contact · Kirkwood office
Contact the office
If you have been involved in a critical incident, call before you give any statement. Otherwise, tell us what happened and we tell you where the matter stands.
Call 314.621.0622 Send a message
- Hours
- Weekdays, 8 am to 5 pm
- Visits by appointment